The Saturday DispatchTexas A&M · Week 6 · The Scouting Report
Texas A&M · Week 6 · The Scouting Report Install week of Oct 5–10 · published Monday

The Scouting Report: A Field Goal Back, on the Road, Against the Quarterback With No Picks

A week after "we just got our butts whooped," the Aggies ran the ball 72% of the time and beat Arkansas 34–7; Mike Elko's word for it was "joy." Now they go to Columbia as a field-goal underdog against a Missouri team that just beat No. 8 Florida 45–17, jumped to No. 14, and has a quarterback, Austin Simmons, with 13 touchdowns and no interceptions in 136 throws. Eli Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M, and the Aggies have won the last three in the series by 21, 31 and 21. Our board leans Missouri harder than the line does: Simmons against an Aggie coverage at the 27th percentile, and the Aggie run game against the best run-stopping front it has seen since LSU, which held it to 2.8 a carry in the box. We apply two lessons from the Arkansas grading, and Coaching & Luck takes a side for the first time. Friday's Walkthrough, at kickoff minus 24 hours, affirmed the call: the line closed to Missouri −3.5 at both books, a point past Monday's consensus and a half-point past the call, with no reason anyone has printed, and Thursday's report changed nothing on either side.

Everything we think about this game. A week after the LSU game, when the coach said his team "just got our butts whooped," A&M ran the ball on nearly three of every four plays and beat Arkansas 34 to 7; Mike Elko's word for the night was "joy." Now A&M plays at Missouri, where it is expected to lose by about a field goal. Missouri just beat Florida, then the No. 8 team in the country, 45 to 17, moved up to No. 14, and has a quarterback, Austin Simmons, who has thrown 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions all year. Missouri's coach, Eli Drinkwitz, has never beaten A&M in three tries, and A&M has won the last three games in the series by three touchdowns or more. Our numbers lean Missouri's way a little harder than the betting line does: Simmons against an A&M pass defense that has struggled, and A&M's running game against the best run-stopping defense it has faced since LSU, which held it under 3 yards a carry. We apply two lessons from last week's grading, and our coaching-and-luck matchup picks a side for the first time. On Friday we checked the call once more and kept it: the betting line moved to Missouri by 3.5 at both books, half a point past our score and with no reason anyone has reported, and Thursday's injury list changed nothing for either team.

Sat, Oct 10 · 11:00 AM CT · ABC Faurot Field at Memorial Stadium, Columbia Line on Monday: Missouri −2.5, the consensus of the two books we follow (DraftKings Missouri −1.5, where it opened; Bovada Missouri −3.5, opened −5) · over/under 50.5 at DraftKings and 48 at Bovada, both where they opened Line on Friday: Missouri −3.5 at both books (DraftKings from −1.5; Bovada unmoved) · over/under 48.5 at both (DraftKings down from 50.5, Bovada up from 48) Forecast: dry, mostly cloudy around the kick and partly sunny for the day, about 77 degrees at the 11 AM kick and the mid 80s by the fourth quarter, high near 86, south wind around 6 mph, no rain in the forecast (National Weather Service point forecast for Columbia, issued Friday 9:21 AM CT) Series: Texas A&M leads 11-7 in our data service's count (Missouri On SI counts it 12-7) · last meeting Texas A&M 38, Missouri 17 (Nov 8, 2025, Columbia) · A&M has won the last three
The Call · made Mon, Oct 5, and left alone · affirmed Fri, Oct 9graded Sunday
Missouri 26
the call
Texas A&M 23
our side
Missouri −2.5
the betting line, Monday
Missouri by 7.5
our computer model

Why this number: The 26–23 call rides the market, and the market is close: DraftKings has Missouri −1.5, where it opened, and Bovada has Missouri −3.5 after opening at −5, so the consensus is 2.5 and we round to a field goal; the totals are 50.5 and 48, both unmoved, and the moneylines work out to about a 52% chance Missouri wins at DraftKings and 64% at Bovada, roughly 58% between them. Our computer model, built on SP+ ratings, has Missouri 30–22, by 7.5, five points more Missouri than the line; its ratings have Missouri at +13.7 (25th) and A&M at +8.9 (39th), with 2.5 points for the home field. One caution on the model: those are the ratings as our data service published them before the Week 5 games (it had not updated at build time), so neither the 34–7 nor the 45–17 is in them. We print it so it can be graded, not so anyone should bet it; it agrees with the market on the winner, and on margin the two are 4 and 5 this season, the market ahead. The history: since 2023, favorites of 1.5 to 3.5 points in the first five weeks are 147-125 straight up, and the median margin across all 272 of those games, wins and losses together, is 2; it is close to a coin flip, which is what a 2.5-point line says. What makes this number wrong in Missouri's favor: Simmons, at 9.3 an attempt and a passing game at the 92nd percentile, against an Aggie coverage that allows passing value at the 27th and explosive passes at the 17th, and a Missouri front that allows 2.17 line yards a carry, the 93rd percentile, against an Aggie run game that just found itself against Arkansas's 12th. What makes it wrong in A&M's favor: Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M, the last three meetings went 35–14, 41–10 and 38–17, Missouri's rushing value sits at the 25th percentile even after Jamal Roberts's 211 against Florida, and the Aggie front just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards on 22 carries with no rushing touchdown, though the Razorback backs got 5.4 a carry on their 18. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said the Aggie front held Arkansas's backs to 3.8 a carry; 3.8 was A&M's own backs (39 for 149), and Arkansas's went 18 for 97, 5.4, as the Week 5 recap had it. Caught by Tuesday's build. The call and every chip stand.

Why we picked this score: The people betting on this game have Missouri as a small favorite, and the two books we follow do not agree on how small: one has Missouri by 1.5 points, the other by 3.5, so we split the difference, called it a field goal, and wrote down Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. The betting odds give Missouri about a 52% chance to win at one book and 64% at the other, about 58% between them. Our own computer has Missouri by 7.5, five points more than the line; it rates Missouri as roughly the 25th-best team in the country and A&M about 39th, and adds a little for the home field. One caution: those ratings were last updated before Saturday's games, so neither team's big win is in them yet. We print the computer's number so you can see it, but the betting line has been the better guide this season, so the line is what we follow. The history: since 2023, teams favored by about a field goal in the first five weeks of the season have won 147 games and lost 125, and the typical final margin is about 2 points; in other words, this is close to a coin flip, which is what a 2.5-point line means. How this goes better for Missouri: Simmons has been one of the best passers in the country this year, A&M's pass defense has been in the bottom third, and Missouri's defensive front is the best A&M has faced at stopping the run since LSU's. How it goes better for A&M: Missouri's coach has never beaten A&M, the last three games between them were A&M blowouts, Missouri's running game has been below average this year outside of one huge game, and A&M's defense just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards and no rushing touchdown, though Arkansas's running backs averaged 5.4 a carry. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said A&M held Arkansas's running backs under 4 yards a carry; that number was A&M's own backs, and Arkansas's averaged 5.4, as our Sunday grading said. Caught by Tuesday's build. The score and every pick stand.

The Walkthrough Revision, Friday, kickoff minus 24 hours: the call stands at Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. What changed since Monday, and why none of it moves the number. The market closed its disagreement: DraftKings went from Missouri −1.5 to −3.5 and Bovada sat at −3.5, so both books have Missouri −3.5 in the data leg's Friday pull (which ran at 11:03 AM, triggered by hand after the 8:07 AM scheduler did not fire), and the consensus is 3.5, a point past Monday's 2.5. The totals met at 48.5, DraftKings down two from 50.5 and Bovada up a half from 48; the DraftKings moneyline went to −175 / +145 from −118 / −102, Bovada −200 / +170 unchanged, which works out to about a 63% chance Missouri wins, 61% and 64% by book, against 58% Monday. The call's 3 sat a half-point over Monday's consensus and sits a half-point under Friday's; its 49 total is a half-point over the books. The Thursday morning number was already −3.5 at both, so the move was Monday to Wednesday night, and nothing we can find names a reason for it: no injury news on either side, both coaches' sessions as reported, nothing from the beat beyond the number itself (Rock M Nation, Friday morning: "Missouri is a 3.5 point favorite over Texas A&M according to FanDuel"). A one-point consensus move with no cause printed is not grounds to move a number that already sits inside it. The SEC's Thursday report, the second of the week (The Eagle, Thursday 7:12 PM; On3's MizzouToday, 7:11 PM; TexAgs's Thursday update; Texas A&M On SI, Friday morning; the Friday evening edition posts at 7:10 PM tonight, and Saturday's card carries it with the 90-minute one): no changes on either side. For Texas A&M, Mario Craver questionable a second day, the conference's 50% category, his second straight week on the report with the left ankle from LSU (he was a game-time decision last Saturday and was limited after the first quarter, per The Eagle); Blake Ivy out, as Wednesday, still with no reason given (TexAgs); Terry Bussey out for the season; nobody else, so Tamarion Watkins and Jamarion Morrow stay off it and are "expected to play" (Aggies Wire). For Missouri, all 16 names where Wednesday left them: Ahmad Hardy, JaDon Blair, Malae Fonoti, Gavin Hoffman and Josh Atkins out; Darris Smith, Langden Kitchen, Robert Woodyard Jr., Cayden Green, DaMarion Fowlkes, Santana Banner and Kensley Louidor-Faustin questionable; Jaden Jones, Bobby Washington Jr., Jahlil Florence and Brett Norfleet probable. One second-hand read on the seven: Missouri On SI's Friday preview says CBS Sports' Matt Zenitz reported Thursday that Green, Woodyard and Banner are "on track to play," with Louidor-Faustin, Fowlkes, Kitchen and Smith unmentioned. Against the board, chip by chip, Monday's board quoted as it prints. Craver touches w6-e1, Reed's Passing Game vs. the Tiger Secondary, Edge: Missouri; w6-e5, Aggie Deep Game vs. Tiger Coverage, Edge: Even; and, as the first-listed punt returner, w6-e11, Special Teams & Field Position, Edge: Texas A&M, slight. A 50% receiver who leads the team with 23 catches for 235 (The Eagle) does not push a Missouri edge further or turn an Even, and he played last week at the same status, 14 snaps and one catch; if he sits, Isaiah Horton fields punts, as he did once for 5 yards against Arkansas. Ivy touches w6-e2, The Aggie Line vs. the Tiger Front (Run Blocking), Edge: Missouri, and w6-e4, Aggie Pass Protection vs. the Tiger Pass Rush, Edge: Missouri; he has come off the bench since the LSU reshuffle, with Trovon Baugh at left guard, so both chips are built on the line that plays without him, and losing a reserve does not move a Missouri edge toward A&M. Smith and Kitchen touch w6-e4 too, from the other side: that chip was built on a rush that posted 15 sacks with both of them out against Florida, and Drinkwitz's own Tuesday read was that the Arkansas game after the bye is "probably more realistic," and On3's Thursday report adds his test, that each "would need to practice by Thursday to go on Saturday," so Missouri without them is the Missouri the chip already prices. Woodyard touches w6-e3, Edwards, Owens and the Backs vs. the Tiger Run Defense, Edge: Missouri, slight; he is the green-dot linebacker, Jeremiah Beasley wore the dot when he left the Florida game, and Zenitz has him on track. Green touches w6-e8, The Tiger Line vs. the Aggie Front (Run Blocking), and w6-e9, Tiger Pass Protection vs. the Aggie Pass Rush, both Edge: Texas A&M, slight; a 50% left tackle could only firm two chips that are already A&M's, Zenitz has him on track, and Jack Lange started the opener in his place. Fowlkes touches w6-e11; without him the field-position bar the chip already leans against gets thinner, which firms the chip rather than moving it. Banner and Louidor-Faustin, the starting safeties, touch w6-e1 and w6-e5; both at 50% is the one place on the board a Friday downgrade could thin a Missouri edge, and it is Saturday's problem, not a cause today. No chip rests on a player who is out; the one new out, Ivy, is a reserve. The rest of the week's news, none of it a cause. Drinkwitz's Thursday was a statement, not a session: freshman offensive lineman DJ Jones "received his heart transplant and his surgery went well. He is now recovering" (On3; the Columbia Missourian), and Missouri wears a heart-shaped DJ sticker Saturday. Three Missouri freshmen, cornerbacks Ahmod Billins and Trashundon Neal and receiver Karsten Fiene, were arrested Monday on a first-degree harassment charge and are away from the team under what Drinkwitz called "protocols in place" (Columbia Missourian, Oct 6); they have eight snaps between them, none since Week 1 (Fiene one, Billins four, Neal three on kick coverage; Missouri On SI, Oct 6), and the SEC report does not list disciplinary absences. Elko, as The Eagle reported him Thursday, on Simmons: "He delivers the ball really accurately. He's comfortable throwing it in the tight windows. He's got a lot of confidence in his arm and his ability to make throws," which is the first tell in the coach's words. A&M wears maroon helmets, white jerseys and white pants (12thman.com, Thursday). The weather is the one thing that changed character since Monday, and it changed toward nothing: the National Weather Service's Friday 9:21 AM point forecast for Columbia has Saturday dry, mostly cloudy around the kick and partly sunny for the day, about 77 degrees at the 11 AM kick and the mid 80s by the fourth quarter, a high near 86, a south wind around 6 mph, no rain in the forecast (KBTX's Thursday night read: "No weather woes to be found other than a little heat"). Warm and still is not a cause. AFFIRMED: Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Saturday's two-minute read carries the Friday evening report and the 90-minute one.

Our Friday check, a day before kickoff: we are keeping the score at Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Here is what changed since Monday and why none of it moves our number. The betting line moved, a little: on Monday one book had Missouri by 1.5 and the other by 3.5, and by Friday both had Missouri by 3.5, so the middle of the market went from 2.5 to 3.5. The expected total points met at 48.5 (one book came down two, the other went up half a point), and the odds now give Missouri about a 63% chance to win, up from 58% Monday. Our 3-point call was half a point above the line on Monday and is half a point below it now; our 49 total is half a point above the books. The line had already reached 3.5 by Thursday morning, and we could not find any reason for the move: no injury news on either side, nothing either coach said, and nothing from the beat writers beyond the number itself. A one-point move with no reason behind it is not grounds to change a score that already sits next to it. The conference's Thursday injury list, the second of the week (the Friday evening list comes out at 7:10 tonight, and Saturday's card will carry it along with the one 90 minutes before kickoff): no changes for either team. For A&M, receiver Mario Craver is questionable for a second day, which the conference defines as a 50% chance to play, his second straight week on the list with the ankle he hurt at LSU (he was a game-time decision last Saturday and played little after the first quarter); offensive lineman Blake Ivy is out, as he was Wednesday, still with no reason given; receiver Terry Bussey is out for the season; and nobody else from A&M is listed, so linebacker Tamarion Watkins and running back Jamarion Morrow are expected to play. For Missouri, all 16 names stayed where Wednesday put them: five out (running backs Ahmad Hardy and Malae Fonoti, safety JaDon Blair, tight end Gavin Hoffman and offensive lineman Josh Atkins), seven questionable (edge rushers Darris Smith and Langden Kitchen, linebacker Robert Woodyard Jr., left tackle Cayden Green, returner DaMarion Fowlkes and safeties Santana Banner and Kensley Louidor-Faustin) and four probable (Jaden Jones, Bobby Washington Jr., Jahlil Florence and Brett Norfleet). One second-hand note: Missouri On SI's Friday preview says a CBS Sports reporter, Matt Zenitz, reported Thursday that Green, Woodyard and Banner are "on track to play," and said nothing about the other four. Does any of that change a matchup we rated? Craver is A&M's leading receiver, 23 catches for 235 yards, but a 50-50 receiver does not change our Missouri edge on A&M's passing game or our toss-up on A&M's deep passing, and he played last week at the same status; he also returns punts, and if he sits, Isaiah Horton does it, as he did once last week. Ivy has been a backup since A&M rearranged its line after the LSU game, with Trovon Baugh at left guard, so our two Missouri edges on A&M's blocking were built on a line that already plays without him. Smith and Kitchen are Missouri's two starting edge rushers, but our Missouri edge on its pass rush was built on what that rush did with both of them out against Florida, and Missouri's coach said Tuesday that the game after Missouri's bye week is "probably more realistic" for their return, and that each would need to practice by Thursday to play Saturday, so Missouri without them is the Missouri we already rated. Woodyard is the linebacker who wears the helmet radio; a teammate, Jeremiah Beasley, wore it when he left the Florida game, and the report is that he is on track. Green is Missouri's left tackle; if he sat, it would only strengthen two matchups we already gave to A&M, the report is that he is on track, and Jack Lange started in his place in Missouri's opener. Fowlkes is Missouri's kick and punt returner; without him, the field-position advantage we already picked against gets smaller, which helps our pick rather than hurting it. The two safeties are the one spot where a Friday downgrade could shrink a Missouri edge, and that is Saturday's question, not today's. No matchup we rated rests on a player who is out; the one new out, Ivy, is a backup. The rest of the week's news, none of it a reason to change the score. Missouri's coach, Eli Drinkwitz, did not hold a Thursday session; he issued a statement that freshman offensive lineman DJ Jones "received his heart transplant and his surgery went well. He is now recovering," and Missouri will wear a heart-shaped DJ sticker on its helmets Saturday. Three Missouri freshmen, cornerbacks Ahmod Billins and Trashundon Neal and receiver Karsten Fiene, were arrested Monday on a harassment charge and are away from the team while the school follows what Drinkwitz called its "protocols in place"; the three have played eight snaps between them, none since the opener, and the conference's injury list does not cover disciplinary absences. A&M's Mike Elko, as the Bryan-College Station Eagle quoted him Thursday, on Simmons: "He delivers the ball really accurately. He's comfortable throwing it in the tight windows. He's got a lot of confidence in his arm and his ability to make throws," which is our first early sign in the coach's words. A&M will wear maroon helmets, white jerseys and white pants. The weather is the one thing that looks different from Monday, and it is different in the direction of nothing: the National Weather Service's Friday morning forecast for Columbia has Saturday dry, mostly cloudy around the kickoff and partly sunny for the day, about 77 degrees at the 11 AM kickoff and the mid 80s by the fourth quarter, a high near 86, a light south wind, and no rain in the forecast; KBTX's weather desk put it as "No weather woes to be found other than a little heat." Warm and still is not a reason to change a score. We are keeping the call: Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Saturday's two-minute read carries the Friday evening and pregame injury lists.

Three Tells, Measured Early

  1. Simmons's yards per attempt over his first 15 throws. He is at 9.3 for the season, 92 of 136 for 1,270, 13 touchdowns and no interceptions, and was 23 of 30 for 340 against Florida. The Aggie coverage allows passing value at the 27th percentile and explosive passes at the 17th, and this is the chip we have graded wrong three weeks running. Nine an attempt over the first 15 says the Missouri edge on the board is the right size; under six says the Arkansas night, 13 of 25 for 111, was the coverage and not the opponent, and the call is light on A&M.The first sign is how many yards Austin Simmons gets each time he throws, over his first 15 throws. He averages 9.3 yards a throw this season, has 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions, and threw for 340 yards against Florida. A&M's pass defense has been in the bottom third of the country, and this is the matchup we have gotten wrong three weeks in a row. Nine yards a throw over the first 15 says our Missouri edge here is the right size; under six says A&M's pass defense really has turned a corner, and our score is too low on A&M.
  2. Sixty yards on the Aggies' first 15 carries, sacks excluded, Reed's included. Against Arkansas the run game was the whole plan: 72% runs, 231 yards, Edwards 11 for 66 and two scores, Reed 9 for 66. Missouri's front is the other end of the country, 2.17 line yards allowed (93rd percentile), a 27.5% stuff rate (93rd), rush success allowed at the 86th, and the best A&M has met since LSU's (99th on all three), which held the Aggies to 2.8 a carry in the box. Sixty on the first 15, four a carry, says the Arkansas game was real and the field-goal line is right; under 35 says the Aggies are one-dimensional again, in the wrong direction, and the fourth quarter belongs to Simmons.The second sign is the simplest one on the page: add up the yards on A&M's first 15 running plays, counting Marcel Reed's runs and leaving out sacks. Against Arkansas, running the ball was the whole plan: nearly three of every four plays, 231 yards, and 66 each for KJ Edwards and Reed. Missouri's defensive front is the best A&M has seen at stopping runs at the line since LSU, which held A&M under 3 yards a carry. Sixty yards on those first 15, four a carry, says last week was real and the field-goal line is right; under 35 says A&M is back to not being able to run, and the late going belongs to Simmons.
  3. Pressure on Simmons on one of every four of his first 20 dropbacks, sacks or hurries. Missouri has allowed five sacks in five games and havoc at the 22nd percentile: the line gives up disruption but Simmons gets rid of the ball. The Aggie rush has five sacks all year and, by PFF's count via KBTX, one sack and 11 pressures against Arkansas, most of it from five- and six-man rushes with a lead after two games at a 13% blitz rate. Five pressures across the first 20 says the Aggie front is the version that showed up Saturday and the slight A&M edge on the board holds; one or none, against a line that has been got to, says the rush is the problem again.The third sign is how often Simmons has an A&M defender in his face, counting, of his first 20 drop-backs to throw, the ones where he is tackled before he can throw or forced to hurry. Missouri's blockers let defenders into the backfield more than most, but Simmons has been sacked only five times all year because he gets the ball out. A&M's rush has only five sacks all season, though it pressured Arkansas's quarterback 11 times by one count, mostly by sending extra rushers once it had the lead. Five of the first 20 with Simmons chased or flattened says the A&M front from Saturday showed up again; one or none, against blockers who have been beaten before, says the rush is the problem again.
The words we use
The words we use
The call is the final score we are predicting. We write it down at the start of the week and leave it alone, the way you would write your guess on a napkin before kickoff and not touch it after.
The market is the betting line, which is the number of points the people wagering real money expect the favorite to win by. Those people have been better at this than our computer so far, so our call leans on their number.
The model is our computer's own guess at the score, built from the season's numbers. We print it next to the betting line so you can see when the two agree and when they do not.
Tells are three early signs to watch in the first stretch of the game. If they show up, the game is going the way we said; if they do not, we were probably wrong, and you will know it before we do.
Edges are our answer, one matchup at a time, to the question of which team has the better side of it.
Graded means that on Sunday we go back over everything we said and mark each piece right, partly right, or wrong.

The Bottom Line

Missouri should win this by a field goal, and the shape of it is Simmons against the Aggie coverage: 9.3 an attempt, 13 touchdowns, no interceptions, Cayden Lee and Donovan Olugbode at 15 a catch, against a secondary that allows passing value at the 27th percentile and has graded wrong three weeks running. The Aggies' answer is the one they found Saturday: run it. A&M ran on 72% of its plays against Arkansas and got 231 yards, with KJ Edwards at 6.5 a carry for the season; Missouri's front, 2.17 line yards allowed and a 27.5% stuff rate, both at the 93rd percentile, is the first front since LSU's (99th on both) built to stop that, and LSU held the Aggies to 2.8 a carry in the box. Drinkwitz's own worry, after the Florida game: "We better contain the quarterback better than we did on power reads this week," which is Reed, 43 carries for 170 and a 40-yard run. Missouri's running game is Jamal Roberts, 113 for 606 and 5.4 a carry with 211 against Florida, on a rushing-value number at the 25th percentile because the rest of the carries have gone nowhere; the Aggie front held Arkansas to 103 on 22 and no rushing touchdown, with the Razorback backs at 5.4 a carry on 18 (corrected Oct 6; see the call box). Missouri is 4-1, the loss 31–24 at Mississippi State; A&M is 3-2 and unranked, Missouri No. 14. Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M.

We think Missouri wins by about a field goal, and the way it happens is Austin Simmons throwing on A&M's pass defense. He has 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions, two receivers averaging 15 yards a catch, and he is facing a secondary that has been in the bottom third of the country and that we have misjudged three weeks in a row. A&M's answer is the one it found Saturday: run the ball. A&M ran on nearly three of every four plays against Arkansas for 231 yards, and freshman KJ Edwards averages 6.5 yards a carry this season; but Missouri's defensive front is the best A&M has faced at stopping the run at the line since LSU, which held A&M under 3 yards a carry. Missouri's coach said after the Florida game that his defense had better "contain the quarterback better than we did on power reads this week," and that means Reed, who has 170 rushing yards and a 40-yard run. Missouri's own running game is Jamal Roberts, who ran for 211 yards against Florida and averages 5.4 a carry, though the running game as a whole has been below average because so many of the other carries go nowhere; A&M's defense just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards and no rushing touchdown, with Arkansas's running backs at 5.4 a carry (corrected Oct 6; see the box above). Missouri is 4-1, with the loss at Mississippi State; A&M is 3-2 and out of the rankings, Missouri is No. 14. Missouri's coach has never beaten A&M.

Common opponents: none this season. Pace: A&M has run 357 plays through five games, Missouri 337; A&M has held the ball 34:15 a game, Missouri 30:14. Ratings in the table and the model are SP+ as published before the Week 5 games; the service had not updated at build time.

What success looks like for Texas A&M

  1. Run it anyway, and run it wide. Edwards's 20-yard touchdown went around the left end, where A&M had run 8% of the time before Saturday (KBTX); Missouri's front allows 2.17 line yards a carry and stuffs 27.5% of runs, both at the 93rd percentile, so the inside is closed and the edges and Reed's legs are the run game. Drinkwitz said as much: contain the quarterback on power reads, the sweeps and the jet sweeps. Elko's own hedge, via KBTX: "I don't know that it always has to be that percentage, but we've got to be able to establish the ground game effectively," with five of the SEC's top seven run defenses still on the schedule.Run the ball anyway, and run it to the outside. KJ Edwards's 20-yard touchdown Saturday went around the left end, a direction A&M had almost never run before. Missouri's front is very hard to run on between the tackles, so the edges and Reed's own runs are the way. Missouri's coach said as much after the Florida game: his defense has to do a better job on the quarterback's runs and the sweeps. Elko added his own caution: it does not always have to be 72% runs, but A&M has to be able to run, with five of the conference's top seven run defenses still ahead.
  2. Keep Lee and Olugbode in front of them. Lee is 33 for 496 at 15.0 a catch, Olugbode 27 for 416 with six touchdowns and a 65-yard long; Missouri's explosive passing is at the 70th percentile, the Aggie coverage at the 17th at explosives allowed. The Arkansas night (13 of 25 for 111) is one night; this is the problem that showed up against Kentucky and LSU.Do not let Cayden Lee and Donovan Olugbode get behind the defense. They average 15 yards a catch between them, Olugbode has six touchdowns and a 65-yard catch, and A&M has been among the worst in the country at giving up long passes. Holding Arkansas down Saturday was one night; the long-ball problem showed up against Kentucky and LSU.
  3. Get to Simmons. Missouri's protection allows havoc at the 22nd percentile; Simmons has been sacked five times because he gets rid of it. The Aggie front had one sack and 11 pressures against Arkansas by PFF's count via KBTX after two sacks against Kentucky and none at LSU; the third tell counts it.Get to Simmons. Missouri's blockers let defenders through more than most teams do, but Simmons gets the ball out so fast he has been sacked only five times all year. A&M's rush pressured Arkansas's quarterback 11 times Saturday by one count after barely touching LSU's; the third sign above counts it.

How Missouri wins it

  1. Throw it, because the bar says so. Missouri's passing value is at the 92nd percentile and its passing success rate at the 82nd; A&M's pass defense allows value at the 27th and success at the 25th. Simmons is 92 of 136 for 1,270, 9.3 an attempt, and has not thrown an interception.Throw the ball, because the numbers say so. Missouri's passing game has been among the best in the country this year and A&M's pass defense in the bottom third. Simmons has completed 68% of his passes at 9.3 yards a throw and has not thrown an interception all season.
  2. Make the Aggies throw on third and long. Missouri's front-seven havoc is at the 88th percentile with 15 sacks (Daeden Hopkins 6.5); A&M converts 43.2% on third down and Reed is at 6.1 an attempt for the season. Stop the run on first down, which is what Missouri does best (rush success allowed at the 86th), and the Aggie offense is the one from Baton Rouge again.Make A&M throw on third and long. Missouri's defense gets into the backfield more than most, with 15 sacks, 6.5 of them by Daeden Hopkins. A&M converts about 43% of its third downs, and Reed averages a modest 6.1 yards a throw. Stop the run on first down, which Missouri does very well, and A&M's offense looks like it did at LSU.
  3. Win the kicking game, or at least do not lose it. Blake Craig is 8 of 12 on field goals; David Olano is 7 of 7 with a 57-yarder. Missouri is flagged for 68.4 yards a game, A&M 40.8. In a field-goal game, the margins on this board are A&M's.Do not lose the game on kicks and penalties. Missouri's kicker has missed four of 12 field goals; A&M's has made all seven, including one from 57 yards. Missouri gets penalized about 68 yards a game, A&M about 41. In a game expected to be decided by a field goal, those small things lean A&M's way.

The Matchup Board

Each bar is that side of the team's rank against every other team in the country, computed from 2026 through five games with garbage time removed, or, where it tells the truer story, from the full 2025 season; the note says which. Missouri has a new quarterback in Simmons and is missing last year's All-American back, so its 2025 offensive bars describe a different offense. The edge label on each matchup is our judgment after looking at both years. Two lessons from the Arkansas grading are applied: the chips on the Aggie coverage and the Aggie protection are built from the opponent's quarterback and the opponent's rush, not from what A&M's defense or line did last week; and Coaching & Luck, which sat at Even on all four A&M boards and graded wrong all four times, takes a side.

Each bar shows how good that side of the team is compared with every other team in the country, using either the five games so far this year or all of last season, whichever tells the truer story; the note says which. Missouri has a new quarterback this year and is missing last year's star running back, so last year's Missouri offense numbers describe a different offense. The longer bar has the edge, and the label next to each matchup is our judgment after looking at both. Two lessons from last week's grading are applied: our calls on A&M's pass defense and A&M's pass blocking are built from how good the other team's quarterback and pass rush are, not from how A&M did last week; and our coaching-and-luck matchup, which we called a toss-up four weeks running and got wrong all four times, picks a side this week.

When Texas A&M has the ball
Reed's Passing Game vs. the Tiger SecondaryEdge: Missouri
30%
54%
The 2026 bar leans Missouri by 24 (Aggie passing value at the 30th percentile, Missouri pass defense at the 54th at value allowed, and at the 80th at pass success allowed); the 2025 bar leaned Missouri too (80 vs. 86). Reed is 85 of 149 for 908, 6.1 an attempt, six touchdowns and four interceptions, and was 13 of 19 for 170 against Arkansas, 8.9 an attempt. Missouri has four interceptions and Sione Laulea five passes defended. Missouri, on both years. This year's numbers lean Missouri: A&M's passing game has been below average, and Missouri's pass defense is good at keeping completions short. Last year leaned Missouri too. Reed has completed 57% of his passes at 6.1 yards a throw, with six touchdowns and four interceptions, and averaged almost 9 yards a throw against Arkansas. A Missouri edge, on both years' numbers.
The Aggie Line vs. the Tiger Front (Run Blocking)Edge: Missouri
39%
93%
The widest gap on this side of the ball: Aggie line yards at the 39th percentile (3.02 a carry) against a Missouri front that allows 2.17, the 93rd, and stuffs 27.5% of runs, also the 93rd. The 2025 bar was close (77 vs. 83). The Aggie line's Saturday was its best (231 rushing yards, 72% runs, Elko: "hidden in the last two weeks has been some improvement in our O-line cohesion"), and the inside run is still Missouri's. Missouri. The biggest gap on this side of the ball: A&M's blockers have been a little below average at opening lanes, and Missouri's front has been among the best in the country at closing them and stopping runs at the line. Last year the two were close. A&M's line had its best day Saturday, and Elko said the improvement had been "hidden in the last two weeks," but running inside on Missouri is still Missouri's side of it. A Missouri edge.
Edwards, Owens and the Backs vs. the Tiger Run DefenseEdge: Missouri, slight
44%
86%
The 2026 bar leans Missouri by 42 (Aggie rushing value at the 44th percentile, Missouri at the 86th at value allowed and the 86th at rush success allowed); the 2025 bar was dead even (76 vs. 76). Edwards is 28 for 181, 6.5 a carry, two scores and the longest back's run of the year (20); Owens 70 for 291 at 4.2; Baker 29 for 101 and three touchdowns. Missouri allows 2.6 a carry with 444 rushing yards against it in five games. Slight, not full: Mississippi State ran for 122 through Bothwell two weeks ago and Missouri's own safety said so after Florida ("last week we didn't do a great job of stopping the run"), though he also said they fixed it; the second tell measures which Missouri shows up. This year's numbers lean Missouri: A&M's running game has been about average, and Missouri's run defense among the best in the country, allowing 2.6 yards a carry. Last year the two were dead even. KJ Edwards averages 6.5 a carry with the longest run by an A&M back this year, Rueben Owens 4.2, and Carsyn Baker has three touchdowns. A slight Missouri edge, not a full one, because Mississippi State ran on Missouri two weeks ago, as one of its own defenders said after Florida (while adding that they fixed it), and the second early sign above measures it.
Aggie Pass Protection vs. the Tiger Pass RushEdge: Missouri
52%
88%
Built from Missouri's rush, per the lesson: front-seven havoc at the 88th percentile, 15 sacks in five games, Daeden Hopkins 6.5 of them with 7 tackles for loss, Jason Dowell 2, and that with the starting edges Darris Smith and Langden Kitchen out against Florida. The Aggie protection allows havoc at the 52nd and has allowed eight sacks; it allowed none against Arkansas, which is one night against a rush at the 45th percentile and does not move this chip. The 2025 bar was A&M's (96 vs. 93), with a different line. Missouri. This one is built from how good Missouri's pass rush is, which is the lesson from last week: Missouri gets into the backfield more than most, with 15 sacks in five games, 6.5 of them by Daeden Hopkins, and it did that with its two starting edge rushers out against Florida. A&M's blockers have been about average and have allowed eight sacks; none against Arkansas, but that was one night against an average rush, and it does not change this call. Last year's numbers favored A&M, with different blockers. A Missouri edge.
Aggie Deep Game vs. Tiger CoverageEdge: Even
14%
16%
Two bars at the bottom of the country: Aggie explosive passing at the 14th percentile, Missouri coverage at the 16th at explosives allowed (1.76 a play, the same figure A&M's coverage allows). The 2025 bar leaned A&M (51 vs. 40). A&M's longest completion of the year is Kiotti Armstrong's 54-yard catch-and-run Saturday; before that it was 36. Even: neither unit has shown it can do the thing this pairing is about, and the Even is defended by two numbers two points apart. Both numbers are at the bottom: A&M rarely completes a long pass, and Missouri gives up long passes about as often as A&M's defense does. Last year leaned A&M. A&M's longest completion this year is tight end Kiotti Armstrong's 54-yarder on Saturday; before that it was 36 yards. A toss-up, because neither side has shown it can do the thing this matchup is about, and the two numbers are two points apart.
When Missouri has the ball
Simmons's Passing Game vs. Aggie CoverageEdge: Missouri
27%
92%
Built from the quarterback, per the lesson, and the quarterback is the best on the schedule so far: Missouri's passing value is at the 92nd percentile and its passing success rate at the 82nd; Simmons is 92 of 136 for 1,270, 9.3 an attempt, 13 touchdowns, no interceptions, 23 of 30 for 340 against Florida. The Aggie coverage allows passing value at the 27th and success at the 25th. Arkansas's 13 of 25 for 111 on Saturday is the reason this chip is not built from A&M's last game: the chip graded wrong three weeks running by leaning on the last game, twice too kind to A&M and once too harsh. The 2025 bar leaned A&M (82 vs. 27), against last year's quarterback. Missouri, full size, and the first tell measures it. This one is built from how good the other quarterback is, which is the lesson from last week, and Austin Simmons is the best quarterback A&M has faced this year: 68% completions, 9.3 yards a throw, 13 touchdowns and no interceptions, and 340 yards against Florida. A&M's pass defense has been in the bottom third of the country. Holding Arkansas to 111 passing yards on Saturday is exactly why we no longer build this call from A&M's last game: we got it wrong three weeks in a row that way. Last year's numbers favored A&M against a different Missouri quarterback. A full Missouri edge, and the first early sign above measures it.
Roberts and the Tiger Backs vs. the Aggie Run DefenseEdge: Texas A&M, slight
85%
25%
The widest gap in A&M's favor on the board, and the one with the biggest asterisk: A&M allows rushing value at the 85th percentile, and Missouri produces it at the 25th with rush success at the 14th. The asterisk is Jamal Roberts, 113 for 606 at 5.4 with runs of 77 and 80 against Florida, 211 that day; the 25th percentile is what the other carries look like, and Drinkwitz said afterward, "We better start running the ball better on first and second down, or we're going to be in real trouble versus A&M." The 2025 bar leaned Missouri (37 vs. 87), with Ahmad Hardy, who is out. The Aggie front held Arkansas to 103 on 22 with no rushing touchdown, but the Razorback backs got 18 for 97, 5.4 a carry, after the chip graded wrong against Kentucky and LSU and partly against Arkansas. Texas A&M, slight, which is as far as the recap's rule lets a chip climb one week after a partly. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said the Aggie front held Arkansas's backs to 3.8; that was A&M's own backs, and Arkansas's went 18 for 97 (5.4), per the Week 5 recap. Caught by Tuesday's build. The chip was already slight and does not move. The biggest gap in A&M's favor on the board, and the one with the biggest asterisk: A&M's run defense has been very good on the season's numbers, and Missouri's running game has been poor on them. The asterisk is Jamal Roberts, who averages 5.4 a carry and had runs of 77 and 80 yards against Florida; the poor number is what the other carries look like, and Missouri's coach said afterward his team had better run the ball better on first and second down or it would be "in real trouble versus A&M." Last year leaned Missouri, with a star back who is out. A&M's defense held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards and no rushing touchdown, but Arkansas's running backs still averaged 5.4 a carry, after we got this matchup wrong against Kentucky and LSU and half right against Arkansas. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said A&M held Arkansas's running backs under 4 yards a carry; that number was A&M's own backs, and Arkansas's averaged 5.4, as our Sunday grading said. Caught by Tuesday's build. The pick was already a small edge and does not change. A slight A&M edge, which is as far as our rule lets a matchup climb one week after a half-right.
The Tiger Line vs. the Aggie Front (Run Blocking)Edge: Texas A&M, slight
51%
30%
The two lines meet at the same number: Missouri's line creates 2.88 line yards a carry, the 30th percentile, and the Aggie front allows 2.88, the 51st. Missouri's line is stuffed on 18.9% of runs (31st). The 2025 bar leaned A&M (81 vs. 73). Texas A&M, slight: a 21-point gap in the bar, held to slight because this chip has graded partly four weeks running, the direction right and the per-carry number wrong each time. The two lines meet at the same number: Missouri's blockers average 2.88 yards a carry at the line, which is below average, and A&M's front allows 2.88, which is about average. Missouri's runners are stopped at the line more often than most. Last year leaned A&M too. A slight A&M edge, held to slight because we have been half right on this matchup four weeks in a row.
Tiger Pass Protection vs. the Aggie Pass RushEdge: Texas A&M, slight
75%
22%
The bar says A&M by 53: Aggie front-seven havoc at the 75th percentile against Missouri protection that allows havoc at the 22nd. The counter is in the sack column: Missouri has allowed five in five games, because Simmons gets the ball out, and A&M has made five, Marco Jones two. The 2025 bar was A&M's too (98 vs. 82). This chip graded worst at LSU and partly against Arkansas (one sack and 11 pressures by PFF's count via KBTX, with a lead and five- and six-man rushes; the box's four came in one quarter, the second, at 14–7 and 21–7). Texas A&M, slight, held to the third tell. The numbers say A&M: its defenders get into the backfield well, and Missouri's blockers let them in more than most. The catch is in the sack column: Missouri's quarterback has been sacked only five times all year because he gets the ball out fast, and A&M has only five sacks. Last year favored A&M too. This is the matchup we got most wrong at LSU and half right against Arkansas, when the pressure came in one quarter, with a lead and extra rushers, and then stopped. A slight A&M edge, and the third early sign above decides whether it holds.
Lee, Olugbode and the Deep Game vs. the Aggie Big-Play ProblemEdge: Missouri
17%
70%
Missouri's explosive passing is at the 70th percentile; the Aggie coverage allows explosives at the 17th, after 53, 42 and 32 to Kentucky and 57, 40, 36, 35 and 26 at LSU. Lee is 33 for 496 (15.0, a long of 47), Olugbode 27 for 416 with six touchdowns and a 65-yarder, Caleb Goodie 24.0 a catch on three. The 2025 bar leaned A&M (33 vs. 15), with last year's quarterback throwing. Missouri, on the problem that has shown up in both losses and the quarterback who can use it. Missouri completes long passes more often than most teams, and A&M has been among the worst in the country at allowing them: three big ones to Kentucky, five at LSU. Cayden Lee averages 15 yards a catch, Donovan Olugbode has six touchdowns and a 65-yard catch. Last year leaned A&M, with a different Missouri quarterback. A Missouri edge, on a problem that showed up in both A&M losses, against a quarterback who can take advantage of it.
The margins
Special Teams & Field PositionEdge: Texas A&M, slight
86%
96%
The bar leans Missouri (average starting spot at the 96th percentile to A&M's 86th; last year 24 vs. 93), and DaMarion Fowlkes has a punt-return touchdown and 19.7 a return. The rest leans A&M: David Olano 7 of 7 with a 57-yarder, the longest by an Aggie since 1999, to Blake Craig's 8 of 12 (long 52); Tyler White 49.1 a punt to Brunno Reus's 46.5; A&M flagged for 40.8 yards a game, Missouri 68.4. Texas A&M, slight, against the bar, because in a field-goal game the kicker and the flags are the margin. Missouri has gotten better starting field position than almost anyone, and DaMarion Fowlkes has returned a punt for a touchdown. The rest leans A&M: David Olano has made all seven of his field goals, one from 57 yards, the longest by an A&M kicker since 1999, while Missouri's Blake Craig has missed four of 12; A&M's punter averages 49 yards to Missouri's 46.5; and A&M is penalized about 41 yards a game to Missouri's 68. A slight A&M edge, against the field-position bar, because in a game decided by a field goal the kicker and the penalties are the difference.
Coaching & LuckEdge: Missouri, slight
No computed bar, and no Even: this chip sat at Even on all four A&M boards and graded wrong all four times, so from this week it takes a side and says why. Missouri, slight. The luck half: A&M's +3 turnover margin is all fumble margin (+4, the luckiest stat there is) with interceptions at −1; Missouri's +4 is all interceptions, four made and none thrown in 152 team attempts, which is closer to a habit. The coaching half cuts the other way, and is why this is slight: Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M and 7-19 in the regular season against ranked teams at Missouri (Yahoo Sports), the last three in this series were blowouts, and Elko just answered two losses with the most disciplined game plan of his season. An 11 AM kick in Columbia, Missouri's first morning kickoff of the season (Columbia Daily Tribune), for an Aggie team that has played four of five at home. No bar here, and no toss-up: we called this one a toss-up four weeks in a row and were wrong every time, so this week it picks a side and says why. A slight Missouri edge. The luck half: A&M has come out 3 turnovers ahead this year, but all of that is fumble recoveries, which are mostly luck, and it has thrown more interceptions than it has caught; Missouri is 4 ahead on interceptions alone, with none thrown all year, which is closer to a habit than luck. The coaching half goes the other way, which is why the edge is only slight: Missouri's coach has never beaten A&M and has a losing record against ranked teams, the last three games in this series were blowouts, and Elko just answered two losses with the most disciplined game plan of his season. An 11 AM kickoff in Columbia, Missouri's first morning game of the season, for an A&M team that has played four of its five games at home.

Game-Week Intel

Texas A&M Storylines

Missouri Storylines

Chatter check: Aggie spaces have turned from quarterback-change talk to "Sonic and Knuckles" and the kicker, and are already on the 11 AM kick; Tiger spaces are on the Florida win and the program-record nine-game streak it ended, which Drinkwitz called "noise" (Missouri On SI, Kansas City Star); the Florida and LSU carousel talk is last offseason's, closed by his extension (USA TODAY via Yahoo, Oct 3). Nothing in it moves a number on this page.

Availability & Injury Report · from the SEC's official reports, Wednesday and Thursday editions (The Eagle, On3's MizzouToday, TexAgs, Texas A&M On SI, Aggies Wire, Missouri On SI, KBTX, the Columbia Missourian), plus the beat; positions from this week's rosters. Thursday's edition changed nothing on either side. Texas A&M: Mario Craver · WR · Questionable both days, the conference's 50% category, a second straight week on the report with the left ankle from LSU; a game-time decision last Saturday, 14 snaps and one catch against Arkansas, limited after the first quarter; Blake Ivy · OL · Out both days, no reason given, a starter at left guard in the first three games and off the bench in the last two, with Trovon Baugh at left guard since LSU; Terry Bussey · WR · Out both days, out for the season; Tamarion Watkins · LB and Jamarion Morrow · RB · Not listed either day, "expected to play" (Aggies Wire); Ashton Bethel-Roman · WR · Not listed either day, a starter against Arkansas; Isaiah Horton · WR · Available, the other punt returner on the depth chart. Madden Williams · WR, Tiger Riden Jr. · RB, Chace Sims · DT · Out for the season. Missouri (16 names, all unchanged from Wednesday): Ahmad Hardy · RB, JaDon Blair · S, Malae Fonoti · RB, Gavin Hoffman · TE and Josh Atkins · OL · Out both days (Hardy not yet cleared to begin the two-week practice ramp-up after a May gunshot wound; the other four have not played since Week 1 or at all); Darris Smith · EDGE and Langden Kitchen · EDGE · Questionable both days, the starting edge rushers, neither has played since Mississippi State at the latest, and Drinkwitz said Tuesday the Arkansas game after the bye is "probably more realistic"; Robert Woodyard Jr. · LB · Questionable both days, the green-dot linebacker, Jeremiah Beasley the dot if he sits; Cayden Green · OL · Questionable both days, the starting left tackle, Jack Lange the opener's starter in his place; DaMarion Fowlkes · WR · Questionable both days, the punt and kickoff returner, Cayden Lee behind him on punts; Santana Banner · S and Kensley Louidor-Faustin · S · Questionable both days, the starting safeties; Jaden Jones · EDGE, Bobby Washington Jr. · LB, Jahlil Florence · CB and Brett Norfleet · TE · Probable both days. Missouri On SI's Friday preview relays CBS Sports' Matt Zenitz, Thursday: Green, Woodyard and Banner "on track to play." Not on the report: DJ Jones · OL, a freshman who had not played, received a heart transplant Wednesday night and is recovering (Drinkwitz's Thursday statement); Ahmod Billins · DB, Trashundon Neal · CB and Karsten Fiene · WR, freshmen, are away from the team after Monday's arrests (Columbia Missourian, Oct 6). None of it changes the call; the Walkthrough Revision in the call box says why, chip by chip. This block was updated Oct 6 (Monday's sessions and both depth charts, in Tuesday's Early Downs edition), Oct 7 (Drinkwitz's Tuesday session, in Wednesday's Third Down edition), corrected in place Oct 8 from the SEC's Wednesday report (Craver questionable, not no update; Watkins not listed, not out; Ivy out; the Missouri names; the sources in Thursday's Red Zone & Special Teams edition), and rewritten Friday from the Thursday report. No chip, no tell and not the call changed at any step. Checked Friday, Oct 9, 11:03 AM CT; the Friday evening (7:10 PM) and 90-minute (9:30 AM Saturday) reports follow, and Saturday's card carries them.

What the Data Says

Two sets of numbers: the full 2025 season, and 2026 through five games, which is a watch and not a verdict. The SP+ rows are as the data service published them before the Week 5 games. Definitions for every metric live in the Data Dictionary.

Two sets of numbers: all of last season, and the five games so far this year, which is still early to trust. The ratings rows were last updated before Saturday's games. Every number is defined in the Data Dictionary.

Schedule-adjusted view (SP+)Texas A&MMissouri
SP+ overall, 2025 (rank)+20.7 (No. 9)+14.4 (No. 21)
SP+ overall, 2026 (rank), pre-Week 5+8.9 (No. 39)+13.7 (No. 25)
SP+ offense, 2026+31.4+31.2
SP+ defense, 2026 (lower is better)+22.5+17.3
Off. success rate, 2026 (pctl)42.9% (45th)44.4% (56th)
Off. explosiveness, 2026 (pctl)1.12 (12th)1.29 (61st)
Def. success rate, 2026 (pctl)41.1% (44th)34.0% (90th)
Def. points per scoring opportunity, 2026 (pctl)2.83 (80th)3.27 (57th)
Third down, 202643.2%43.9%
Turnover margin, 2025 / 2026−9 / +3−5 / +4
Sacks made / allowed, 20265 / 815 / 5
Penalty yards a game, 202640.868.4
2025 record11-28-5
2026 results50-0 Missouri State, 48-20 Arizona State, 21-31 Kentucky, 6-35 at LSU, 34-7 Arkansas54-14 Arkansas-Pine Bluff, 38-21 at Kansas, 27-17 Troy, 24-31 at Mississippi State, 45-17 Florida

What the table says: the two offenses rate the same in SP+ and the Missouri defense rates five points better, which with the home field is roughly the model's 7.5. The rows underneath split: Missouri's offense is more explosive (61st to 12th) and its defense far better at stopping plays (90th to 44th); A&M finishes drives better on both sides of the ball (80th to 57th at keeping opponents out once they get close). The sack rows are the game in miniature: 15 and 5 against 5 and 8. Last year's rows describe an 11-2 A&M and an 8-5 Missouri with a different quarterback and a different back.

The install · Week 6 · every edition on its slot

Each edition below names the matchup it installs. Texas plays Oklahoma in Dallas the same day; its own install runs beside this one.

Tue · Early DownsThe run ladder, both sides. The Aggie backs and Reed against a front that allows 2.17 line yards a carry and stuffs 27.5% of runs, and Roberts, 5.4 a carry on a rushing-value number at the 25th percentile, against the front that held Arkansas to 103 on 22 (its backs 5.4 a carry; corrected Oct 6). Done Tuesday, Oct 6: the Early Downs edition.
Wed · Third DownReed on third down against a rush with 15 sacks, and Simmons on third down against the Aggie rush. A&M converts 43.2%, Missouri 43.9%; the Aggie defense allows 26.4% (14 of 53), Missouri's 33.3% (25 of 75). The pass ladder, protection on both sides (Missouri has allowed five and the Aggie rush has five; A&M has allowed eight), and the coverage against Lee and Olugbode. Done Wednesday, Oct 7: the Third Down edition.
Thu · Red Zone & STFinishing drives. A&M scores 4.47 points per scoring opportunity (76th percentile), Missouri 3.81 (49th); the Aggie defense allows 2.83 (80th), Missouri's 3.27 (57th). Goal line (A&M 91st percentile in power success, Missouri 70th), punting 49.1 against 46.5, kickers 7 of 7 and 8 of 12, Fowlkes's returns. Done Thursday, Oct 8: the Red Zone & Special Teams edition, with the SEC's Wednesday report: Missouri's defense has allowed ten red-zone trips in five games and nine scored; the Aggies have scored on 19 of 23 and 16 touchdowns; Craig's two blocked kicks; Reus's zero punt returns allowed.
Fri · WalkthroughThe digest, the availability sweep, and the Walkthrough Revision at 11:03 AM CT, kickoff minus 24 hours: the SEC's Wednesday and Thursday reports, the Friday lines, and the call changed for a stated reason or affirmed. Done Friday, Oct 9, 11:03 AM: the call affirmed; the line closed to Missouri −3.5 at both books with no reason anyone has printed, Thursday's report changed nothing (Craver questionable a second day, Ivy out, Missouri's seven still questionable), the forecast warm and dry.

Sources & Method

Our call follows the betting line, and our computer model is printed beside it for comparison, because the line has been the better guide: the one time they disagreed on a winner this season, Ohio State at Texas, the line was right; on margin the market leads 5 to 4. This week the model is five points more Missouri than the market on the same winner, on ratings that predate Saturday's games; that gap is printed, not bet. Missouri's gold fails our color check in light mode (too light for a bar) and black never passes, so Missouri appears on this page in a darker shade of its own gold, validated against Aggie maroon in both modes, with the team named on every label. Not betting advice. Every claim on this page is graded Sunday, misses first.