A week after "we just got our butts whooped," the Aggies ran the ball 72% of the time and beat Arkansas 34–7; Mike Elko's word for it was "joy." Now they go to Columbia as a field-goal underdog against a Missouri team that just beat No. 8 Florida 45–17, jumped to No. 14, and has a quarterback, Austin Simmons, with 13 touchdowns and no interceptions in 136 throws. Eli Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M, and the Aggies have won the last three in the series by 21, 31 and 21. Our board leans Missouri harder than the line does: Simmons against an Aggie coverage at the 27th percentile, and the Aggie run game against the best run-stopping front it has seen since LSU, which held it to 2.8 a carry in the box. We apply two lessons from the Arkansas grading, and Coaching & Luck takes a side for the first time. Friday's Walkthrough, at kickoff minus 24 hours, affirmed the call: the line closed to Missouri −3.5 at both books, a point past Monday's consensus and a half-point past the call, with no reason anyone has printed, and Thursday's report changed nothing on either side.
Everything we think about this game. A week after the LSU game, when the coach said his team "just got our butts whooped," A&M ran the ball on nearly three of every four plays and beat Arkansas 34 to 7; Mike Elko's word for the night was "joy." Now A&M plays at Missouri, where it is expected to lose by about a field goal. Missouri just beat Florida, then the No. 8 team in the country, 45 to 17, moved up to No. 14, and has a quarterback, Austin Simmons, who has thrown 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions all year. Missouri's coach, Eli Drinkwitz, has never beaten A&M in three tries, and A&M has won the last three games in the series by three touchdowns or more. Our numbers lean Missouri's way a little harder than the betting line does: Simmons against an A&M pass defense that has struggled, and A&M's running game against the best run-stopping defense it has faced since LSU, which held it under 3 yards a carry. We apply two lessons from last week's grading, and our coaching-and-luck matchup picks a side for the first time. On Friday we checked the call once more and kept it: the betting line moved to Missouri by 3.5 at both books, half a point past our score and with no reason anyone has reported, and Thursday's injury list changed nothing for either team.
Why this number: The 26–23 call rides the market, and the market is close: DraftKings has Missouri −1.5, where it opened, and Bovada has Missouri −3.5 after opening at −5, so the consensus is 2.5 and we round to a field goal; the totals are 50.5 and 48, both unmoved, and the moneylines work out to about a 52% chance Missouri wins at DraftKings and 64% at Bovada, roughly 58% between them. Our computer model, built on SP+ ratings, has Missouri 30–22, by 7.5, five points more Missouri than the line; its ratings have Missouri at +13.7 (25th) and A&M at +8.9 (39th), with 2.5 points for the home field. One caution on the model: those are the ratings as our data service published them before the Week 5 games (it had not updated at build time), so neither the 34–7 nor the 45–17 is in them. We print it so it can be graded, not so anyone should bet it; it agrees with the market on the winner, and on margin the two are 4 and 5 this season, the market ahead. The history: since 2023, favorites of 1.5 to 3.5 points in the first five weeks are 147-125 straight up, and the median margin across all 272 of those games, wins and losses together, is 2; it is close to a coin flip, which is what a 2.5-point line says. What makes this number wrong in Missouri's favor: Simmons, at 9.3 an attempt and a passing game at the 92nd percentile, against an Aggie coverage that allows passing value at the 27th and explosive passes at the 17th, and a Missouri front that allows 2.17 line yards a carry, the 93rd percentile, against an Aggie run game that just found itself against Arkansas's 12th. What makes it wrong in A&M's favor: Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M, the last three meetings went 35–14, 41–10 and 38–17, Missouri's rushing value sits at the 25th percentile even after Jamal Roberts's 211 against Florida, and the Aggie front just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards on 22 carries with no rushing touchdown, though the Razorback backs got 5.4 a carry on their 18. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said the Aggie front held Arkansas's backs to 3.8 a carry; 3.8 was A&M's own backs (39 for 149), and Arkansas's went 18 for 97, 5.4, as the Week 5 recap had it. Caught by Tuesday's build. The call and every chip stand.
Why we picked this score: The people betting on this game have Missouri as a small favorite, and the two books we follow do not agree on how small: one has Missouri by 1.5 points, the other by 3.5, so we split the difference, called it a field goal, and wrote down Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. The betting odds give Missouri about a 52% chance to win at one book and 64% at the other, about 58% between them. Our own computer has Missouri by 7.5, five points more than the line; it rates Missouri as roughly the 25th-best team in the country and A&M about 39th, and adds a little for the home field. One caution: those ratings were last updated before Saturday's games, so neither team's big win is in them yet. We print the computer's number so you can see it, but the betting line has been the better guide this season, so the line is what we follow. The history: since 2023, teams favored by about a field goal in the first five weeks of the season have won 147 games and lost 125, and the typical final margin is about 2 points; in other words, this is close to a coin flip, which is what a 2.5-point line means. How this goes better for Missouri: Simmons has been one of the best passers in the country this year, A&M's pass defense has been in the bottom third, and Missouri's defensive front is the best A&M has faced at stopping the run since LSU's. How it goes better for A&M: Missouri's coach has never beaten A&M, the last three games between them were A&M blowouts, Missouri's running game has been below average this year outside of one huge game, and A&M's defense just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards and no rushing touchdown, though Arkansas's running backs averaged 5.4 a carry. Updated Oct 6: as first published this said A&M held Arkansas's running backs under 4 yards a carry; that number was A&M's own backs, and Arkansas's averaged 5.4, as our Sunday grading said. Caught by Tuesday's build. The score and every pick stand.
The Walkthrough Revision, Friday, kickoff minus 24 hours: the call stands at Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. What changed since Monday, and why none of it moves the number. The market closed its disagreement: DraftKings went from Missouri −1.5 to −3.5 and Bovada sat at −3.5, so both books have Missouri −3.5 in the data leg's Friday pull (which ran at 11:03 AM, triggered by hand after the 8:07 AM scheduler did not fire), and the consensus is 3.5, a point past Monday's 2.5. The totals met at 48.5, DraftKings down two from 50.5 and Bovada up a half from 48; the DraftKings moneyline went to −175 / +145 from −118 / −102, Bovada −200 / +170 unchanged, which works out to about a 63% chance Missouri wins, 61% and 64% by book, against 58% Monday. The call's 3 sat a half-point over Monday's consensus and sits a half-point under Friday's; its 49 total is a half-point over the books. The Thursday morning number was already −3.5 at both, so the move was Monday to Wednesday night, and nothing we can find names a reason for it: no injury news on either side, both coaches' sessions as reported, nothing from the beat beyond the number itself (Rock M Nation, Friday morning: "Missouri is a 3.5 point favorite over Texas A&M according to FanDuel"). A one-point consensus move with no cause printed is not grounds to move a number that already sits inside it. The SEC's Thursday report, the second of the week (The Eagle, Thursday 7:12 PM; On3's MizzouToday, 7:11 PM; TexAgs's Thursday update; Texas A&M On SI, Friday morning; the Friday evening edition posts at 7:10 PM tonight, and Saturday's card carries it with the 90-minute one): no changes on either side. For Texas A&M, Mario Craver questionable a second day, the conference's 50% category, his second straight week on the report with the left ankle from LSU (he was a game-time decision last Saturday and was limited after the first quarter, per The Eagle); Blake Ivy out, as Wednesday, still with no reason given (TexAgs); Terry Bussey out for the season; nobody else, so Tamarion Watkins and Jamarion Morrow stay off it and are "expected to play" (Aggies Wire). For Missouri, all 16 names where Wednesday left them: Ahmad Hardy, JaDon Blair, Malae Fonoti, Gavin Hoffman and Josh Atkins out; Darris Smith, Langden Kitchen, Robert Woodyard Jr., Cayden Green, DaMarion Fowlkes, Santana Banner and Kensley Louidor-Faustin questionable; Jaden Jones, Bobby Washington Jr., Jahlil Florence and Brett Norfleet probable. One second-hand read on the seven: Missouri On SI's Friday preview says CBS Sports' Matt Zenitz reported Thursday that Green, Woodyard and Banner are "on track to play," with Louidor-Faustin, Fowlkes, Kitchen and Smith unmentioned. Against the board, chip by chip, Monday's board quoted as it prints. Craver touches w6-e1, Reed's Passing Game vs. the Tiger Secondary, Edge: Missouri; w6-e5, Aggie Deep Game vs. Tiger Coverage, Edge: Even; and, as the first-listed punt returner, w6-e11, Special Teams & Field Position, Edge: Texas A&M, slight. A 50% receiver who leads the team with 23 catches for 235 (The Eagle) does not push a Missouri edge further or turn an Even, and he played last week at the same status, 14 snaps and one catch; if he sits, Isaiah Horton fields punts, as he did once for 5 yards against Arkansas. Ivy touches w6-e2, The Aggie Line vs. the Tiger Front (Run Blocking), Edge: Missouri, and w6-e4, Aggie Pass Protection vs. the Tiger Pass Rush, Edge: Missouri; he has come off the bench since the LSU reshuffle, with Trovon Baugh at left guard, so both chips are built on the line that plays without him, and losing a reserve does not move a Missouri edge toward A&M. Smith and Kitchen touch w6-e4 too, from the other side: that chip was built on a rush that posted 15 sacks with both of them out against Florida, and Drinkwitz's own Tuesday read was that the Arkansas game after the bye is "probably more realistic," and On3's Thursday report adds his test, that each "would need to practice by Thursday to go on Saturday," so Missouri without them is the Missouri the chip already prices. Woodyard touches w6-e3, Edwards, Owens and the Backs vs. the Tiger Run Defense, Edge: Missouri, slight; he is the green-dot linebacker, Jeremiah Beasley wore the dot when he left the Florida game, and Zenitz has him on track. Green touches w6-e8, The Tiger Line vs. the Aggie Front (Run Blocking), and w6-e9, Tiger Pass Protection vs. the Aggie Pass Rush, both Edge: Texas A&M, slight; a 50% left tackle could only firm two chips that are already A&M's, Zenitz has him on track, and Jack Lange started the opener in his place. Fowlkes touches w6-e11; without him the field-position bar the chip already leans against gets thinner, which firms the chip rather than moving it. Banner and Louidor-Faustin, the starting safeties, touch w6-e1 and w6-e5; both at 50% is the one place on the board a Friday downgrade could thin a Missouri edge, and it is Saturday's problem, not a cause today. No chip rests on a player who is out; the one new out, Ivy, is a reserve. The rest of the week's news, none of it a cause. Drinkwitz's Thursday was a statement, not a session: freshman offensive lineman DJ Jones "received his heart transplant and his surgery went well. He is now recovering" (On3; the Columbia Missourian), and Missouri wears a heart-shaped DJ sticker Saturday. Three Missouri freshmen, cornerbacks Ahmod Billins and Trashundon Neal and receiver Karsten Fiene, were arrested Monday on a first-degree harassment charge and are away from the team under what Drinkwitz called "protocols in place" (Columbia Missourian, Oct 6); they have eight snaps between them, none since Week 1 (Fiene one, Billins four, Neal three on kick coverage; Missouri On SI, Oct 6), and the SEC report does not list disciplinary absences. Elko, as The Eagle reported him Thursday, on Simmons: "He delivers the ball really accurately. He's comfortable throwing it in the tight windows. He's got a lot of confidence in his arm and his ability to make throws," which is the first tell in the coach's words. A&M wears maroon helmets, white jerseys and white pants (12thman.com, Thursday). The weather is the one thing that changed character since Monday, and it changed toward nothing: the National Weather Service's Friday 9:21 AM point forecast for Columbia has Saturday dry, mostly cloudy around the kick and partly sunny for the day, about 77 degrees at the 11 AM kick and the mid 80s by the fourth quarter, a high near 86, a south wind around 6 mph, no rain in the forecast (KBTX's Thursday night read: "No weather woes to be found other than a little heat"). Warm and still is not a cause. AFFIRMED: Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Saturday's two-minute read carries the Friday evening report and the 90-minute one.
Our Friday check, a day before kickoff: we are keeping the score at Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Here is what changed since Monday and why none of it moves our number. The betting line moved, a little: on Monday one book had Missouri by 1.5 and the other by 3.5, and by Friday both had Missouri by 3.5, so the middle of the market went from 2.5 to 3.5. The expected total points met at 48.5 (one book came down two, the other went up half a point), and the odds now give Missouri about a 63% chance to win, up from 58% Monday. Our 3-point call was half a point above the line on Monday and is half a point below it now; our 49 total is half a point above the books. The line had already reached 3.5 by Thursday morning, and we could not find any reason for the move: no injury news on either side, nothing either coach said, and nothing from the beat writers beyond the number itself. A one-point move with no reason behind it is not grounds to change a score that already sits next to it. The conference's Thursday injury list, the second of the week (the Friday evening list comes out at 7:10 tonight, and Saturday's card will carry it along with the one 90 minutes before kickoff): no changes for either team. For A&M, receiver Mario Craver is questionable for a second day, which the conference defines as a 50% chance to play, his second straight week on the list with the ankle he hurt at LSU (he was a game-time decision last Saturday and played little after the first quarter); offensive lineman Blake Ivy is out, as he was Wednesday, still with no reason given; receiver Terry Bussey is out for the season; and nobody else from A&M is listed, so linebacker Tamarion Watkins and running back Jamarion Morrow are expected to play. For Missouri, all 16 names stayed where Wednesday put them: five out (running backs Ahmad Hardy and Malae Fonoti, safety JaDon Blair, tight end Gavin Hoffman and offensive lineman Josh Atkins), seven questionable (edge rushers Darris Smith and Langden Kitchen, linebacker Robert Woodyard Jr., left tackle Cayden Green, returner DaMarion Fowlkes and safeties Santana Banner and Kensley Louidor-Faustin) and four probable (Jaden Jones, Bobby Washington Jr., Jahlil Florence and Brett Norfleet). One second-hand note: Missouri On SI's Friday preview says a CBS Sports reporter, Matt Zenitz, reported Thursday that Green, Woodyard and Banner are "on track to play," and said nothing about the other four. Does any of that change a matchup we rated? Craver is A&M's leading receiver, 23 catches for 235 yards, but a 50-50 receiver does not change our Missouri edge on A&M's passing game or our toss-up on A&M's deep passing, and he played last week at the same status; he also returns punts, and if he sits, Isaiah Horton does it, as he did once last week. Ivy has been a backup since A&M rearranged its line after the LSU game, with Trovon Baugh at left guard, so our two Missouri edges on A&M's blocking were built on a line that already plays without him. Smith and Kitchen are Missouri's two starting edge rushers, but our Missouri edge on its pass rush was built on what that rush did with both of them out against Florida, and Missouri's coach said Tuesday that the game after Missouri's bye week is "probably more realistic" for their return, and that each would need to practice by Thursday to play Saturday, so Missouri without them is the Missouri we already rated. Woodyard is the linebacker who wears the helmet radio; a teammate, Jeremiah Beasley, wore it when he left the Florida game, and the report is that he is on track. Green is Missouri's left tackle; if he sat, it would only strengthen two matchups we already gave to A&M, the report is that he is on track, and Jack Lange started in his place in Missouri's opener. Fowlkes is Missouri's kick and punt returner; without him, the field-position advantage we already picked against gets smaller, which helps our pick rather than hurting it. The two safeties are the one spot where a Friday downgrade could shrink a Missouri edge, and that is Saturday's question, not today's. No matchup we rated rests on a player who is out; the one new out, Ivy, is a backup. The rest of the week's news, none of it a reason to change the score. Missouri's coach, Eli Drinkwitz, did not hold a Thursday session; he issued a statement that freshman offensive lineman DJ Jones "received his heart transplant and his surgery went well. He is now recovering," and Missouri will wear a heart-shaped DJ sticker on its helmets Saturday. Three Missouri freshmen, cornerbacks Ahmod Billins and Trashundon Neal and receiver Karsten Fiene, were arrested Monday on a harassment charge and are away from the team while the school follows what Drinkwitz called its "protocols in place"; the three have played eight snaps between them, none since the opener, and the conference's injury list does not cover disciplinary absences. A&M's Mike Elko, as the Bryan-College Station Eagle quoted him Thursday, on Simmons: "He delivers the ball really accurately. He's comfortable throwing it in the tight windows. He's got a lot of confidence in his arm and his ability to make throws," which is our first early sign in the coach's words. A&M will wear maroon helmets, white jerseys and white pants. The weather is the one thing that looks different from Monday, and it is different in the direction of nothing: the National Weather Service's Friday morning forecast for Columbia has Saturday dry, mostly cloudy around the kickoff and partly sunny for the day, about 77 degrees at the 11 AM kickoff and the mid 80s by the fourth quarter, a high near 86, a light south wind, and no rain in the forecast; KBTX's weather desk put it as "No weather woes to be found other than a little heat." Warm and still is not a reason to change a score. We are keeping the call: Missouri 26, Texas A&M 23. Saturday's two-minute read carries the Friday evening and pregame injury lists.
Missouri should win this by a field goal, and the shape of it is Simmons against the Aggie coverage: 9.3 an attempt, 13 touchdowns, no interceptions, Cayden Lee and Donovan Olugbode at 15 a catch, against a secondary that allows passing value at the 27th percentile and has graded wrong three weeks running. The Aggies' answer is the one they found Saturday: run it. A&M ran on 72% of its plays against Arkansas and got 231 yards, with KJ Edwards at 6.5 a carry for the season; Missouri's front, 2.17 line yards allowed and a 27.5% stuff rate, both at the 93rd percentile, is the first front since LSU's (99th on both) built to stop that, and LSU held the Aggies to 2.8 a carry in the box. Drinkwitz's own worry, after the Florida game: "We better contain the quarterback better than we did on power reads this week," which is Reed, 43 carries for 170 and a 40-yard run. Missouri's running game is Jamal Roberts, 113 for 606 and 5.4 a carry with 211 against Florida, on a rushing-value number at the 25th percentile because the rest of the carries have gone nowhere; the Aggie front held Arkansas to 103 on 22 and no rushing touchdown, with the Razorback backs at 5.4 a carry on 18 (corrected Oct 6; see the call box). Missouri is 4-1, the loss 31–24 at Mississippi State; A&M is 3-2 and unranked, Missouri No. 14. Drinkwitz is 0-3 against A&M.
We think Missouri wins by about a field goal, and the way it happens is Austin Simmons throwing on A&M's pass defense. He has 13 touchdown passes and no interceptions, two receivers averaging 15 yards a catch, and he is facing a secondary that has been in the bottom third of the country and that we have misjudged three weeks in a row. A&M's answer is the one it found Saturday: run the ball. A&M ran on nearly three of every four plays against Arkansas for 231 yards, and freshman KJ Edwards averages 6.5 yards a carry this season; but Missouri's defensive front is the best A&M has faced at stopping the run at the line since LSU, which held A&M under 3 yards a carry. Missouri's coach said after the Florida game that his defense had better "contain the quarterback better than we did on power reads this week," and that means Reed, who has 170 rushing yards and a 40-yard run. Missouri's own running game is Jamal Roberts, who ran for 211 yards against Florida and averages 5.4 a carry, though the running game as a whole has been below average because so many of the other carries go nowhere; A&M's defense just held Arkansas to 103 rushing yards and no rushing touchdown, with Arkansas's running backs at 5.4 a carry (corrected Oct 6; see the box above). Missouri is 4-1, with the loss at Mississippi State; A&M is 3-2 and out of the rankings, Missouri is No. 14. Missouri's coach has never beaten A&M.
Common opponents: none this season. Pace: A&M has run 357 plays through five games, Missouri 337; A&M has held the ball 34:15 a game, Missouri 30:14. Ratings in the table and the model are SP+ as published before the Week 5 games; the service had not updated at build time.
Each bar is that side of the team's rank against every other team in the country, computed from 2026 through five games with garbage time removed, or, where it tells the truer story, from the full 2025 season; the note says which. Missouri has a new quarterback in Simmons and is missing last year's All-American back, so its 2025 offensive bars describe a different offense. The edge label on each matchup is our judgment after looking at both years. Two lessons from the Arkansas grading are applied: the chips on the Aggie coverage and the Aggie protection are built from the opponent's quarterback and the opponent's rush, not from what A&M's defense or line did last week; and Coaching & Luck, which sat at Even on all four A&M boards and graded wrong all four times, takes a side.
Each bar shows how good that side of the team is compared with every other team in the country, using either the five games so far this year or all of last season, whichever tells the truer story; the note says which. Missouri has a new quarterback this year and is missing last year's star running back, so last year's Missouri offense numbers describe a different offense. The longer bar has the edge, and the label next to each matchup is our judgment after looking at both. Two lessons from last week's grading are applied: our calls on A&M's pass defense and A&M's pass blocking are built from how good the other team's quarterback and pass rush are, not from how A&M did last week; and our coaching-and-luck matchup, which we called a toss-up four weeks running and got wrong all four times, picks a side this week.
Chatter check: Aggie spaces have turned from quarterback-change talk to "Sonic and Knuckles" and the kicker, and are already on the 11 AM kick; Tiger spaces are on the Florida win and the program-record nine-game streak it ended, which Drinkwitz called "noise" (Missouri On SI, Kansas City Star); the Florida and LSU carousel talk is last offseason's, closed by his extension (USA TODAY via Yahoo, Oct 3). Nothing in it moves a number on this page.
Two sets of numbers: the full 2025 season, and 2026 through five games, which is a watch and not a verdict. The SP+ rows are as the data service published them before the Week 5 games. Definitions for every metric live in the Data Dictionary.
Two sets of numbers: all of last season, and the five games so far this year, which is still early to trust. The ratings rows were last updated before Saturday's games. Every number is defined in the Data Dictionary.
| Schedule-adjusted view (SP+) | Texas A&M | Missouri |
|---|---|---|
| SP+ overall, 2025 (rank) | +20.7 (No. 9) | +14.4 (No. 21) |
| SP+ overall, 2026 (rank), pre-Week 5 | +8.9 (No. 39) | +13.7 (No. 25) |
| SP+ offense, 2026 | +31.4 | +31.2 |
| SP+ defense, 2026 (lower is better) | +22.5 | +17.3 |
| Off. success rate, 2026 (pctl) | 42.9% (45th) | 44.4% (56th) |
| Off. explosiveness, 2026 (pctl) | 1.12 (12th) | 1.29 (61st) |
| Def. success rate, 2026 (pctl) | 41.1% (44th) | 34.0% (90th) |
| Def. points per scoring opportunity, 2026 (pctl) | 2.83 (80th) | 3.27 (57th) |
| Third down, 2026 | 43.2% | 43.9% |
| Turnover margin, 2025 / 2026 | −9 / +3 | −5 / +4 |
| Sacks made / allowed, 2026 | 5 / 8 | 15 / 5 |
| Penalty yards a game, 2026 | 40.8 | 68.4 |
| 2025 record | 11-2 | 8-5 |
| 2026 results | 50-0 Missouri State, 48-20 Arizona State, 21-31 Kentucky, 6-35 at LSU, 34-7 Arkansas | 54-14 Arkansas-Pine Bluff, 38-21 at Kansas, 27-17 Troy, 24-31 at Mississippi State, 45-17 Florida |
What the table says: the two offenses rate the same in SP+ and the Missouri defense rates five points better, which with the home field is roughly the model's 7.5. The rows underneath split: Missouri's offense is more explosive (61st to 12th) and its defense far better at stopping plays (90th to 44th); A&M finishes drives better on both sides of the ball (80th to 57th at keeping opponents out once they get close). The sack rows are the game in miniature: 15 and 5 against 5 and 8. Last year's rows describe an 11-2 A&M and an 8-5 Missouri with a different quarterback and a different back.
Each edition below names the matchup it installs. Texas plays Oklahoma in Dallas the same day; its own install runs beside this one.
Our call follows the betting line, and our computer model is printed beside it for comparison, because the line has been the better guide: the one time they disagreed on a winner this season, Ohio State at Texas, the line was right; on margin the market leads 5 to 4. This week the model is five points more Missouri than the market on the same winner, on ratings that predate Saturday's games; that gap is printed, not bet. Missouri's gold fails our color check in light mode (too light for a bar) and black never passes, so Missouri appears on this page in a darker shade of its own gold, validated against Aggie maroon in both modes, with the team named on every label. Not betting advice. Every claim on this page is graded Sunday, misses first.